| --- Log opened Mon May 25 00:00:05 2015 | ||
| Streepje | hi | 15:16 |
|---|---|---|
| Streepje | does anybody know what the status is of the llvm compiler for or1k? | 15:17 |
| Streepje | because i tried compiling a program with the llvm compiler, but it won't generate correct binaries | 15:17 |
| stekern | Streepje: It definetely have some deficiencies, but fairly complex programs should still work. What do you have problems with= | 15:46 |
| Streepje | eeeeh, i had a problem with compiling, but now i do it again and it just works | 15:57 |
| Streepje | i tried all sorts of things for about an hour but could not compile a simple program | 15:57 |
| Streepje | unbelievable :s | 15:57 |
| Streepje | the problems that i had, had to do with the assembler i think | 16:02 |
| Streepje | if i use the command clang --target=or1k-elf test.c -o test, everything works | 16:03 |
| Streepje | but using clang --target=or1k-elf -c test.c -o test, the simulator says "This ELF is not an executable." | 16:03 |
| Streepje | but anyway, it works now, so thanks :P | 16:06 |
| stekern | great | 16:14 |
| -!- clopez_ is now known as clopez | 20:17 | |
| blueCmd | olofk: I'm re-starting my work on a wb-axi4 bridge | 20:59 |
| blueCmd | let me know if there is anyone that has done this already while I have been inactive | 21:00 |
| blueCmd | (also: ping stekern if he knows) | 21:00 |
| olofk | blueCmd: Not that I know at least. Would be great to have. Let us know if you want any help | 21:09 |
| olofk | blueCmd: Are you targeting axi4lite or full axi4? | 21:10 |
| blueCmd | axi4lite, there are official protocol conversions between axi4 <-> axi4lite | 21:12 |
| blueCmd | might be worth getting a pure axi4 conversion later to have more streamlined bursts | 21:13 |
| blueCmd | but axi4lite will allow using everything axi4 for now, if I understand it correctly | 21:13 |
| blueCmd | olofk: I'm thinking of using wb_bfm_transactor to test a AXI4 block memory. (wb_bfm_transactor -> wb-axi4lite -> axi4lite-axi4 -> axi4 memory) | 21:14 |
| blueCmd | let me know if you have any concerns | 21:14 |
| olofk | I think that's a good idea. Using a axi4 memory will save you from implementing an axi4 slave bfm to test things | 21:17 |
| olofk | Full axi4 has a lot of extra features. Most of them probably won't be used very much, but it would be nice to have bursting | 21:18 |
| olofk | But starting with axi4lite is good. Most peripherals use axi4lite, since you only do single accesses anyway | 21:18 |
| olofk | Can still do wishbone to the memories (or wb->axi4lite->axi4 with reduced performance) | 21:19 |
| blueCmd | yes. I want to use the MIG stuff for my DDR3 controller | 21:57 |
| --- Log closed Tue May 26 00:00:06 2015 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!